The RealKM Open KM Syllabus is a new initiative which attempts to systematically describe the themes and topics required for a fully-rounded education in knowledge management (KM) theory and practice.
The knowledge management (KM) discipline has a mixed track record in regard to evidence-based decision-making. This means that KM is now falling behind the overall field of management and also other management disciplines such as HR.
The good, the bad, and the ugly of planning processes.
Is there a gender imbalance in KM, and if there is, what should we do about it?
Given the seriousness of the fake news issue, is there more that the knowledge management discipline can do? Two options are proposed.
Introductory resources are provided to assist the KM discipline to move to a better evidence-based foundation.
This second part of a two-part series gives suggestions that can help to facilitate the successful adoption of KM initiatives in other cultures.
A recent article asserts that “There are real cultural barriers in the Chinese culture [to KM]”. Is this conclusion appropriate?
Are you working in or aware of a university that might be interested in establishing a full KM course using the syllabus?
It’s actually rather oxymoronic that the development process for an important knowledge management standard has not involved the widest diversity of relevant knowledge.